<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.perfectblogger.com/2007/02/wordpress_21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.perfectblogger.com/2007/02/wordpress_21/</link>
	<description>Make your blog a success!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:17:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gleb Reys</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectblogger.com/2007/02/wordpress_21/comment-page-1/#comment-5823</link>
		<dc:creator>Gleb Reys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectblogger.com/2007/02/wordpress_21/#comment-5823</guid>
		<description>To be honest, Dan, I&#039;m not sure. I haven&#039;t used any of the JavaScript or video code in my posts here. I presume, the problems are still there, but would suggest you give it a try to confirm.

WYSIWYG Pro looks like a mighty tool, but it comes at a price I&#039;m not willing to pay just yet. Besides, it&#039;s very universal and a bit complex for me - while TinyMCE looks nice, clean and simple.

Thanks for stopping by! All the best!
Gleb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, Dan, I&#8217;m not sure. I haven&#8217;t used any of the JavaScript or video code in my posts here. I presume, the problems are still there, but would suggest you give it a try to confirm.</p>
<p>WYSIWYG Pro looks like a mighty tool, but it comes at a price I&#8217;m not willing to pay just yet. Besides, it&#8217;s very universal and a bit complex for me &#8211; while TinyMCE looks nice, clean and simple.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by! All the best!<br />
Gleb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan and Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectblogger.com/2007/02/wordpress_21/comment-page-1/#comment-4789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan and Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectblogger.com/2007/02/wordpress_21/#comment-4789</guid>
		<description>Hey Gleb,

One question here - do you know if the new WP 2.1 visual editor still strips out stuff it doesn&#039;t like, such as Javascript, inline CSS, and YouTube/GoogleVideo embed code?

It just wasn&#039;t usable for us in the older WP release for those reasons, but we found a commercial replacement - WYSIWYG Pro which works. 

Though I&#039;d really like a built-in spell checker and auto-save. :-)

Thanks!
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gleb,</p>
<p>One question here &#8211; do you know if the new WP 2.1 visual editor still strips out stuff it doesn&#8217;t like, such as Javascript, inline CSS, and YouTube/GoogleVideo embed code?</p>
<p>It just wasn&#8217;t usable for us in the older WP release for those reasons, but we found a commercial replacement &#8211; WYSIWYG Pro which works. </p>
<p>Though I&#8217;d really like a built-in spell checker and auto-save. <img src='http://www.perfectblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

